Data collection

Study design

Twenty healthy adults (mean age 36 years, age range 29-46 y.o.(SD = 4.7), 4 men and 16 women) were scan at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Sherbrooke (CHUS) using a clinical 3T MRI scanner (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands) with a 32-channel head coil. Each MRI session was repeated 5 times over 5 months and a 4-week interval (+/- 1 week). For each participant, images were acquired at approximately the same time of day to avoid potential diurnal effects (i.e., a morning participant had all sessions in the morning, with a tolerated 2–3-hour variation).

Study design - 20 healthy subjects

../_images/acquisition_design.png

All MRI data acquisitions were aligned on the anterior commissure-posterior commissure plan (AC-PC) and each MRI session include :

  • Anatomical 3D T1-weighted (3DT1)

  • Multi-shell diffusion-weighted images (DWI)

  • Reverse phase encoding B0 (revb0)

  • inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT)

MRI acquisition parameters

Parameters / Sequences

T1

DWI

Reverse B0

ihMT

T1 ihMT

Phase-encoding direcion*

RL

PA

AP

RL

RL

Technique - Fast imaging method

FFE - TFE

SE - EPI

SE - EPI

FFE - EPI

FFE - EPI

Total scan duration

4 min 20s

9 min 20s

14s

6 min 04 s

13 s

Repetition time (TR, ms)

7.9

4800

4800

112

20

Echo Time (TE, ms)

3.5

92

92

3.6 (Δ = 6)

3.6 (Δ = 6)

Inversion Time (TI, ms)

950

Flip Angle (degree)

8

90

90

15

30

Field of View (FOV, mm)

224 x 224

224 x 224

224 x 224

224 x 224

224 x 224

Slices (n)

150

66

66

65

65

Voxel size (mm)

1 x 1 x 1

2 x 2 x 2

2 x 2 x 2

2 x 2 x 2

2 x 2 x 2

n b0, b-value (n directions)

7, 300 (8), 1000 (32), 2000 (60)

MT stauration pulse

10 Hann pulses of. 0.9 ms duration with 1.5 ms interval

Frequency offset of +/-

7000 Hz

n Echoes - Echo spacing

3 - 6 ms

*The directions are specified in the standard way i.e. in coordinates of the patient (LPH).

An example of bvec and bval file can be downloaded here:

Data conversion: DICOM to BIDS

To convert data we use BIDS standard. An example of the data structure for one subject is shown below:

data-subject
├── dataset_description.json
├── participants.json
├── participants.tsv
├── sub-001_ses-01
├── sub-001_ses-02
├── sub-001_ses-03
├── sub-001_ses-04
├── sub-001_ses-04
├── sub-002_ses-01
├── ...
├── sub-003_ses-01
    │
    ├── anat
    │   ├── sub-003-01_T1w.json
    │   ├── sub-003-01_T1w.nii.gz
    │   ├── sub-003-01_acq-pos_ihmt.json
    │   ├── sub-003-01_acq-pos_ihmt.nii.gz
    │   ├── sub-003-01_acq-neg_ihmt.json
    │   ├── sub-003-01_acq-neg_ihmt.nii.gz
    │   ├── sub-003-01_acq-altnp_ihmt.json
    │   ├── sub-003-01_acq-altnp_ihmt.nii.gz
    │   ├── sub-003-01_acq-altpn_ihmt.json
    │   ├── sub-003-01_acq-altpn_ihmt.nii.gz
    │   ├── sub-003-01_acq-T1w_ihmt.json
    │   └── sub-003-01_acq-T1w_ihmt.nii.gz
    │
    └── dwi
        ├── sub-003-01_dwi.bval
        ├── sub-003-01_dwi.bvec
        ├── sub-003-01_dwi.json
        ├── sub-003-01_dwi.nii.gz
        ├── sub-003-01_b0.json
        ├── sub-003-01_b0.nii.gz
        ├── sub-003-01_rev-b0.json
        └── sub-003-01_rev-b0.nii.gz

To convert our DICOM data folder to the compatible BIDS structure, we used dcm2bids.

dcm2bids -d DICOM_folder -p id_subject -c config.txt -o sub-id

Quality Control raw data

Quality control of raw data was performed using DMRIQC flow DMRIQC flow.

Example of datasets for one subject

  • Anatonimal image

3D-T1w

../_images/3DT1.gif
  • Diffusion images

DWI - b0

DWI - b value = 300

DWI - b value = 1000

DWI - b value = 2000

DWI - Reverse B0

../_images/b0.gif ../_images/b300.gif ../_images/b1000.gif ../_images/b2000.gif ../_images/epi.gif
  • ihMT images

MT-Off

Positive (pos)

Negative (neg)

Alternative pos-neg

Alternative neg-pos

T1w ihMT

../_images/mtoff.gif ../_images/pos.gif ../_images/neg.gif ../_images/altpn.gif ../_images/altnp.gif ../_images/T1w.gif